Lamb, Meters. E., & Gilbride, K. For the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and in conflict dating (pp. 33-60). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Thought similarity and you will relationship achievements one of dating partners: A keen idiographic method
Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Younger, J. (2008). If the I am not saying very hot, could you be scorching or not?: Physical-elegance studies and you will dating choices while the a purpose of an individual’s own appeal. Mental Technology, 19, 669677. [ Links ]
Levinger, G., & Rands, Yards. (1985)patibility in-marriage or any other close matchmaking. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you will incompatible matchmaking (pp. 309-331). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Amount of aspiration. In the J. McV. See (Ed.), Identification and choices problems (Vol. step 1, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Drive. [ Website links ]
Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Predicting relationships relationship fate with insiders’ and you may outsiders’ direction: Who and you may what is questioned matters. Private Matchmaking, thirteen, 349-362. [ Links ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, Elizabeth. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you can marital top quality into the newly weds: Several oriented means. Record away from Identity and Public Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Website links ]
Madden, M., & Lenhart, A good. (2006). Matchmaking. Washington, DC: Report on Pew Websites & Western Lifetime Enterprise. Recovered , of [ Backlinks ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, M. (1999). Determining the accuracy of forecasts about relationships relationship: Exactly how and just why would lovers’ predictions change from the individuals from observers? lovingwomen.org Г¶ver pГҐ denna webbplats Character and you can Personal Psychology Bulletin, 25, 14171429. [ Backlinks ]
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing products on the initiation of heterosexual relationship. Report presented at the Earliest International Conference into the Personal Relationship, Madison, WI. [ Links ]
Merkle, Age.Roentgen., & Richardson, Roentgen.An effective. (2000). Electronic relationship and you may digital relating: Conceptualizing computers mediated intimate dating. Friends, forty two, 187-192. [ Hyperlinks ]
Montoya, R. Yards., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is real resemblance very important to destination? A beneficial meta-investigation out-of actual and you will detected resemblance. Diary of Societal and private Relationship, twenty five, 889-922. [ Backlinks ]
Morry, Yards. M. (2005). Relationship fulfillment just like the a good predictor out-of resemblance ratings; A test of your attraction-similarity theory. Journal out of Social and private Relationship, 22, 561-584. [ Backlinks ]
Log off Personal and personal Relationship, 23, 865-880
Morry, M. Meters. (2007). The fresh new destination-similarity theory certainly one of mix-sex family relations: Relationships pleasure, perceived similarities, and you will mind-offering attitudes. Log away from Social and personal Matchmaking, 24, 117-138. [ Hyperlinks ]
Murstein, B. We. (1987). A clarification and you may expansion of one’s SVR idea away from dyadic combining. Diary out-of ily, 49, 929-947. [ Hyperlinks ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). That will separation: An excellent 14-12 months longitudinal study of black lovers and you will white couples. Log out of Public and private Relationships, 19, 179-202. [ Website links ]
Orenstein, S. (). This new like algorithm Matches thinks it has got discovered an algorithm getting ruling the web based relationships team: A scientific way to find Mr. otherwise Ms. Best. Organization 2.0 Mag. Retrieved to the of [ Links ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Only the congruent endure – Identity parallels within the people. Personality and Private Differences, forty-five, 533-535. [ Website links ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Mate tastes: Just what attributes do individuals appeal inside their short-label sexual and you may a lot of time-identity intimate couples? Journal out-of Mindset and you may Individual Sexuality, a dozen, 1-21. [ Backlinks ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). The new part of mind in the initiation and you will course of public correspondence. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you will in conflict matchmaking (pp. 209-231). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Links ]